In the race to achieve more and deeper desulfurization of fuel oil and other refinery products, the challenges faced by refineries are many. For some, the issue is capacity. Existing H2S gas treatment facilities such as Claus plants may not have sufficient capacity to treat additional H2S gas. In other cases, refiners need to increase sulfur removal efficiency to comply with environmental regulations.
Fig. 1: Typical WSA plant
Treat Claus tail gas
In cases of insufficient sulfur removal rates in Claus plants, a WSA plant can be installed to treat tail gases. Almost all sulfur will still be available as elemental sulfur, while a smaller portion will be processed into concentrated sulfuric acid.
Treat H2S and tail gas simultaneously
Here’s an elegant solution for simultaneously treating H2S gas and tail gas to increase overall sulfur removal efficiency and capacity. Configure a WSA plant to achieve both. Assume that after installation of additional HDS capacity, an additional 50% of H2S gas is generated. The problem is that the existing Claus plant can’t handle the extra load. A simple solution is to direct the additional H2S gas to a WSA plant that also treats the tail gas from the existing Claus plants. As a result, you can realize a combined total sulfur removal efficiency of more than 99.9% and a capacity increase of 50%.
With this approach, the energy-consuming operation of your existing Claus tail gas treatment units becomes superfluous. Two-thirds of the total sulfur will be produced in the Claus plants in the form of elemental sulfur, while the remainder will be produced in the form of concentrated sulfuric acid in the WSA plant. The set-up is illustrated below.
Fig. 2: Sulfuric acid in the WSA plant
Burning high-sulfur residual oil and petcoke
What if a refinery determines that desulfurization of all fuel oil isn’t a viable option? What do you do with the high-sulfur residue from the refinery that cannot easily be sold?
One possibility is to burn the residue to generate steam, heat and power for the refinery or nearby consumers.
The sulfur dioxide (SO2) rich flue gas from the combustion can be treated in a Topsoe SNOX™ plant. It converts SO2 into concentrated sulfuric acid. In contrast to other flue gas cleaning methods, SNOX™ operates without consuming absorption materials and without producing liquid or solid waste that would require handling and disposal.
Unlike other flue gas cleaning methods, the economics of SNOX™ gets better the more sulfur content there is in the fuel. At the same time, a boiler supplied with SNOX™ flue gas cleaning is more energy efficient, with a 5-7 % higher production of energy than a boiler outfitted with conventional flue gas treatment technologies.
The resulting lower carbon footprint (less CO2 per kWh of energy produced) and the absence of waste benefit both the climate and environment: It may generate carbon credits too. The SNOX™ process is a variant of the WSA process. This is illustrated below, along with an upstream boiler.
Fig. 3: SNOX™ process
Studies and answers
We recommend initiating a project by conducting a study to gain insights into how different technologies will perform at a customer’s facility and to discover which solutions are best.
Relevant topics for investigation could include:
Whatever your challenges, contact us for insights that will help you perform a value-adding project.
See our video on WSA technology: